
If you think about it, there is no clearer signal than the fact that Google has rapidly rolled out AI Overviews (and now AI mode), both of which are basically AI-generated content.

Yet there are still many SEOs and digital marketers who think that Google seeks to actively punish AI content.
Post on Reddit
We decided to find out the real answer by looking at 600,000 webpages to understand if Google punishes, rewards, or is simply indifferent to AI content.
Here’s what we found:
We ran each article through our own AI content detector, which is part of Page Inspect in Site Explorer.

Here’s what our AI content detector found:
- 4.6% of pages were categorized as “pure AI.”
- 13.5% were categorized as “pure human.”
- 81.9% were categorized as a mix of two.
Of the ones that were a mix of both human and AI:
- 13.8% showed minimal AI use (1-10% of the page content was categorized as AI)
- 40% showed moderate AI use (11-40%)
- 20.3% showed substantial AI use (41%-70%)
- 7.8% showed dominant AI use (71%-99%)

Sidenote.
No AI content detector is perfect. Like LLMs, AI detectors are statistical models. They deal in probabilities, not certainty. They can be incredibly accurate, but they always carry the risk of false positives.
You can learn more about how AI detectors work, and why they’re useful, in these articles:

Just as there’s no longer any manufactured steel untouched by nuclear fallout, soon there won’t be any piece of content that isn’t ‘tainted’, or assisted, by AI.
We calculated the correlation between AI content percentage and search ranking position across our entire dataset. The correlation was 0.011, effectively zero.

In case this is your first time seeing a box plot, here’s how you should read them:

There is no clear relationship between how much AI-generated content a page has and how highly it ranks on Google. This suggests that Google neither significantly rewards nor penalizes pages just because they use AI.
If you’re looking for a silver lining somewhere, you’d be happy to know that the very highest-ranking pages, i.e. #1, tend to have slightly less AI-generated content.

In fact, if we group them into three groups of minimal AI use (0-30%), some AI use (30-70%), and substantial AI use (70-100%), you’d also be happy to know that the group with minimal AI use correlates very slightly with higher rankings.

This suggests a minor preference for more human-created or lightly AI-assisted content at the very top of the SERPs. But bear in mind that the correlation is very weak.
Wrapping up
From our research, it seems that Google neither actively punishes nor rewards AI content. So, you don’t have to be afraid and avoid AI content at all costs.
Ultimately, Google probably doesn’t care how you made the content. It simply cares whether searchers find it helpful.
If you can make pure AI content that’s unique, helpful, and searchers will want to consume, then I don’t see why not.
But from my experience, and from the data, we can see that it’s difficult to make truly high-quality content from AI alone.
That’s likely why most content creators are leveraging AI as a tool to assist in making content, rather than simply generating them.

Similar Posts
ChatGPT May Scrape Google, but the Results Don’t Match
We know that AI assistants like ChatGPT access search indices, like Google and Bing, to retrieve URLs for their response. But how, exactly? To find out, we’ve run a series of experiments looking at the relationship between the URLs cited by AI assistants, and the results found in Google when searching for the same topics….
35 Post-Event Survey Questions From Our Sold-Out Conference
In October 2024, we organized a sold-out, 500-person conference called Ahrefs Evolve in Singapore. We’ve already covered how we planned the event from start to finish and how we promoted the event. This time round, it’s about how our events can be better next time. Like any good event organizer, we sent out post-event surveys to…
Drush Custom Command Tutorials Updated
Last week we updated most of the Drupal Plugin API content to recommend, and demonstrate, using PHP attributes instead of annotations. This week I’m back with another update doing the same thing for our content on creating custom Drush commands. Which now also use PHP attributes instead of annotations. The big changes to this set…
What Are Referring Domains? A Guide to Referring Domains vs Backlinks + SEO Impact
New to the world of referring domains? Let’s take a look at what they are and how you can use them. Know as much about referring domains as you do about the amount of water on Mars? Well, for any business with an online presence, getting traffic to your website, upping engagement, and building brand…
Entity API Course Updated to Cover the Use of PHP Attributes
As of Drupal 11.1.0, core has support for defining custom entity types (both content and configuration) using PHP attributes instead of annotations. And now, all our Entity API tutorials have been updated to reflect this change. We previously performed extensive updates that rewrote all our tutorials that made use of annotations for Drupal plugins. See…
An Analysis of AI Overview Brand Visibility Factors (75K Brands Studied)
With Google’s AI mode developments, we’re heading toward a future where search results could eventually roll up into one big AI Overview. Soon it won’t be a case of “Should I, or shouldn’t I optimize for AI Overviews?” If you want any chance of search visibility, you’ll need to understand how to rank in Google’s…
