|

AI-Generated Content Does Not Hurt Your Google Rankings (600,000 Pages Analyzed)

AI-Generated Content Does Not Hurt Your Google Rankings (600,000 Pages Analyzed)
In 2023, Google published a blog post stating that they’re not against AI content:
Google's guidelines say they're not against AI content

If you think about it, there is no clearer signal than the fact that Google has rapidly rolled out AI Overviews (and now AI mode), both of which are basically AI-generated content.

Ryan Law's LinkedIn post about how Google won't penalize AI content

Yet there are still many SEOs and digital marketers who think that Google seeks to actively punish AI content.

A Reddit comment saying AI content will be penalized

Post on Reddit

We decided to find out the real answer by looking at 600,000 webpages to understand if Google punishes, rewards, or is simply indifferent to AI content.

Here’s what we found:

Keywords Explorer and extracted the top 20 ranking URLs. We then extracted the content from these URLs, of which we had 600K in our database.

We ran each article through our own AI content detector, which is part of Page Inspect in Site Explorer.

Running my blog post through AI Content Detector

Here’s what our AI content detector found:

  • 4.6% of pages were categorized as “pure AI.”
  • 13.5% were categorized as “pure human.”
  • 81.9% were categorized as a mix of two.

Of the ones that were a mix of both human and AI:

  • 13.8% showed minimal AI use (1-10% of the page content was categorized as AI)
  • 40% showed moderate AI use (11-40%)
  • 20.3% showed substantial AI use (41%-70%)
  • 7.8% showed dominant AI use (71%-99%)
How many pages in the top 20 SERPs are created or assisted with AI

Sidenote.

 No AI content detector is perfect. Like LLMs, AI detectors are statistical models. They deal in probabilities, not certainty. They can be incredibly accurate, but they always carry the risk of false positives.

You can learn more about how AI detectors work, and why they’re useful, in these articles:

State of AI in Content Marketing report, where we surveyed 879 marketers, 87% of respondents use AI to help create content.

Bar chart showing how many marketers use AI to create content

Just as there’s no longer any manufactured steel untouched by nuclear fallout, soon there won’t be any piece of content that isn’t ‘tainted’, or assisted, by AI.

Google neither punishes nor rewards AI content

We calculated the correlation between AI content percentage and search ranking position across our entire dataset. The correlation was 0.011, effectively zero.

Box plot showing how AI usage doesn't predict ranking position

In case this is your first time seeing a box plot, here’s how you should read them:

How to read box plots

There is no clear relationship between how much AI-generated content a page has and how highly it ranks on Google. This suggests that Google neither significantly rewards nor penalizes pages just because they use AI.

Purely AI content rarely reaches the #1 position

If you’re looking for a silver lining somewhere, you’d be happy to know that the very highest-ranking pages, i.e. #1, tend to have slightly less AI-generated content.

Box plots showing AI-generated content usage by search result position

In fact, if we group them into three groups of minimal AI use (0-30%), some AI use (30-70%), and substantial AI use (70-100%), you’d also be happy to know that the group with minimal AI use correlates very slightly with higher rankings.

Box plot showing search ranking distribution by level of AI content in pages

This suggests a minor preference for more human-created or lightly AI-assisted content at the very top of the SERPs. But bear in mind that the correlation is very weak.

Wrapping up

From our research, it seems that Google neither actively punishes nor rewards AI content. So, you don’t have to be afraid and avoid AI content at all costs.

Ultimately, Google probably doesn’t care how you made the content. It simply cares whether searchers find it helpful.

If you can make pure AI content that’s unique, helpful, and searchers will want to consume, then I don’t see why not.

But from my experience, and from the data, we can see that it’s difficult to make truly high-quality content from AI alone.

That’s likely why most content creators are leveraging AI as a tool to assist in making content, rather than simply generating them.

Bar chart showing the common AI-assisted tasks

Similar Posts