
If you think about it, there is no clearer signal than the fact that Google has rapidly rolled out AI Overviews (and now AI mode), both of which are basically AI-generated content.

Yet there are still many SEOs and digital marketers who think that Google seeks to actively punish AI content.
Post on Reddit
We decided to find out the real answer by looking at 600,000 webpages to understand if Google punishes, rewards, or is simply indifferent to AI content.
Here’s what we found:
We ran each article through our own AI content detector, which is part of Page Inspect in Site Explorer.

Here’s what our AI content detector found:
- 4.6% of pages were categorized as “pure AI.”
- 13.5% were categorized as “pure human.”
- 81.9% were categorized as a mix of two.
Of the ones that were a mix of both human and AI:
- 13.8% showed minimal AI use (1-10% of the page content was categorized as AI)
- 40% showed moderate AI use (11-40%)
- 20.3% showed substantial AI use (41%-70%)
- 7.8% showed dominant AI use (71%-99%)

Sidenote.
No AI content detector is perfect. Like LLMs, AI detectors are statistical models. They deal in probabilities, not certainty. They can be incredibly accurate, but they always carry the risk of false positives.
You can learn more about how AI detectors work, and why they’re useful, in these articles:

Just as there’s no longer any manufactured steel untouched by nuclear fallout, soon there won’t be any piece of content that isn’t ‘tainted’, or assisted, by AI.
We calculated the correlation between AI content percentage and search ranking position across our entire dataset. The correlation was 0.011, effectively zero.

In case this is your first time seeing a box plot, here’s how you should read them:

There is no clear relationship between how much AI-generated content a page has and how highly it ranks on Google. This suggests that Google neither significantly rewards nor penalizes pages just because they use AI.
If you’re looking for a silver lining somewhere, you’d be happy to know that the very highest-ranking pages, i.e. #1, tend to have slightly less AI-generated content.

In fact, if we group them into three groups of minimal AI use (0-30%), some AI use (30-70%), and substantial AI use (70-100%), you’d also be happy to know that the group with minimal AI use correlates very slightly with higher rankings.

This suggests a minor preference for more human-created or lightly AI-assisted content at the very top of the SERPs. But bear in mind that the correlation is very weak.
Wrapping up
From our research, it seems that Google neither actively punishes nor rewards AI content. So, you don’t have to be afraid and avoid AI content at all costs.
Ultimately, Google probably doesn’t care how you made the content. It simply cares whether searchers find it helpful.
If you can make pure AI content that’s unique, helpful, and searchers will want to consume, then I don’t see why not.
But from my experience, and from the data, we can see that it’s difficult to make truly high-quality content from AI alone.
That’s likely why most content creators are leveraging AI as a tool to assist in making content, rather than simply generating them.

Similar Posts
8.64% of AI Overviews Appear Outside Position #1 (And as Low as Position #6)
Get the week’s best marketing content AI Overviews aren’t always in the first position in the SERPs. For example, here’s an AI Overview in the 2nd position. See where AI Overviews appear outside of position 1 You can use the SERP features filter along with the Position filter to find some of the AI Overviews outside…
The AI Bots That ~140 Million Websites Block the Most
AI bots power some of the most advanced technologies we use today, from search engines to AI assistants. However, their increasing presence has led to a growing number of websites blocking them. There’s a cost to bots crawling your websites and there’s a social contract between search engines and website owners, where search engines add…
Google Is Looking Out for #1. It’s Time You Do, Too
There’s a major competitor in your search results: Google. The other day, Lily Ray (Vice President of SEO Strategy & Research at Amsive) noticed Google had begun surfacing its own storefront for some competitive “Your Money or Your Life” searches. By Google’s own admission, these kinds of “E-E-A-T” sensitive queries should be reserved for only the…
What Triggers AI Overviews? 86 Factors and 146 Million SERPs Analyzed
What triggers an AI Overview? What types of queries are most likely to generate an AIO, and which are relatively safe? Can we predict where AIOs will appear, and even target SERPs without them? To answer these questions, we analyzed our database of 146 million SERPs and explored how often AI Overviews appeared for 86…
Drush Custom Command Tutorials Updated
Last week we updated most of the Drupal Plugin API content to recommend, and demonstrate, using PHP attributes instead of annotations. This week I’m back with another update doing the same thing for our content on creating custom Drush commands. Which now also use PHP attributes instead of annotations. The big changes to this set…
96.98% of Clicks Happen in the Top 10 Search Results
How many clicks and impressions come from rankings beyond Google’s first page? To find out, we analysed billions of clicks and impressions from Google Search Console. Our findings are a good reminder: page one is where the overwhelming majority of clicks and impressions happen. 96.98% of desktop clicks happen in the top 10 In August 2025, 96.98%…
